Minnesota says federal evidence sharing stalled in Good and Pretti investigations

 Minnesota investigators say federal authorities stopped sharing evidence after a brief resumption this summer, leaving key material unavailable to the state investigations into the January killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal officers. A July 13 handover included body-camera footage and hard drives, according to [Hennepin County’s announcement](https://www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news/2026/July/evidence-sharing). In later court filings, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Superintendent Drew Evans said cooperation stalled soon afterward. County Attorney Mary Moriarty says the U.S. attorney told her on September 10 that evidence sharing was paused indefinitely because of “challenges with D.C.” The [Associated Press](https://apnews.com/article/d18378b40675bb107f9c2d519c2b9853) and [CBS Minnesota](https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/minnesota-feds-stop-sharing-evidence-good-pretti-shootings-lawsuit/) have reviewed the filings. The state says it still seeks Good’s clothing, the phone of the officer who shot her and interview recordings. In Pretti’s case, the requested material includes officers’ phones and firearms, the gun taken from Pretti before he was shot, projectiles and casings, and an officer’s recorded statement. Minnesota says it needs those items to complete independent investigations. No criminal charges have been filed in either death. The Justice Department disputes the state’s legal position. In a Tuesday court filing, DOJ lawyers argued that federal agencies may decline these records requests under the department’s Touhy rules and asked the court to dismiss or transfer the case. Minnesota has asked the judge to order the evidence turned over. Those are the parties’ arguments; the latest filings do not establish wrongdoing or resolve what happened in either shooting. The dispute matters because the missing material could inform whether state prosecutors pursue charges. The judge has not yet ruled on the latest requests, and the filings do not give a date for when evidence sharing might resume. *Conceptual illustration; it does not show the actual courthouse or case evidence.*